Property Comparison
ONE PEARL BANK vs STIRLING RESIDENCES
Queenstown, Tiong Bahru· Both projects in the same district
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ONE PEARL BANK | STIRLING RESIDENCES |
|---|---|---|
| Median PSF | $2,538.184 | $2,140.122 |
| Median Price | $1.97M | $1.58M |
| Recent PSF (Last 10) | $2,633 | $2,363 |
| District | D03 | D03 |
| Property Type | Apartment | Apartment |
| Tenure | 99 yrs lease commencing from 2019 | 99 yrs lease commencing from 2017 |
| Total Units | — | — |
| Completion Year | — | — |
| Transactions | 549 | 748 |
Who Should Buy ONE PEARL BANK vs STIRLING RESIDENCES?
🏠 First-Time Buyer
Stirling Residences offers a more accessible entry point for first-time buyers with a median PSF of $2,140.122, compared to $2,538.184 at One Pearl Bank. This represents a price difference of $398.062 per square foot, reducing the total quantum required for entry into the District 3 apartment market.
📈 Investor
Stirling Residences recorded a higher transaction volume of 748 units compared to 549 units at One Pearl Bank, suggesting greater historical liquidity in the market. The median PSF at One Pearl Bank stands at $2,538.184, which is approximately 18.6% higher than the $2,140.122 median PSF observed at Stirling Residences.
👨👩👧👦 Family
Families seeking a longer remaining lease may consider One Pearl Bank, as its 99-year tenure commenced in 2019, two years later than the 2017 commencement at Stirling Residences. However, the lower median PSF of $2,140.122 at Stirling Residences allows for a lower cost of acquisition for larger living spaces compared to the $2,538.184 median PSF at One Pearl Bank.