Property Comparison
AMBER PARK vs GRAND DUNMAN
East Coast, Marine Parade· Both projects in the same district
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMBER PARK | GRAND DUNMAN |
|---|---|---|
| Median PSF | $2,473.091 | $2,517.339 |
| Median Price | $3.37M | $4.41M |
| Recent PSF (Last 10) | $2,874 | $2,519 |
| District | D15 | D15 |
| Property Type | Condominium | Apartment |
| Tenure | Freehold | 99 yrs lease commencing from 2022 |
| Total Units | — | — |
| Completion Year | — | — |
| Transactions | 471 | 705 |
Who Should Buy AMBER PARK vs GRAND DUNMAN?
🏠 First-Time Buyer
Grand Dunman recorded 705 transactions, indicating higher volume for buyers entering the District 15 market. The median PSF at Grand Dunman is $2,517.339, which is $44.248 higher than the $2,473.091 recorded for Amber Park.
📈 Investor
Grand Dunman shows higher liquidity with 705 transactions compared to 471 at Amber Park. Investors may note that Amber Park offers a freehold tenure at a median PSF of $2,473.091, while the 99-year leasehold Grand Dunman is priced higher at $2,517.339 PSF.
👨👩👧👦 Family
Families may prioritize Amber Park for its freehold tenure in District 15, which carries a median price of $2,473.091 PSF. Grand Dunman provides a 99-year leasehold alternative in the same district with a median PSF of $2,517.339 and a lease commencing from 2022.