Property Comparison
AMBER PARK vs EMERALD OF KATONG
East Coast, Marine Parade· Both projects in the same district
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AMBER PARK | EMERALD OF KATONG |
|---|---|---|
| Median PSF | $2,473.091 | $2,621.631 |
| Median Price | $3.37M | $1.41M |
| Recent PSF (Last 10) | $2,874 | $2,887 |
| District | D15 | D15 |
| Property Type | Condominium | Condominium |
| Tenure | Freehold | 99 years leasehold |
| Total Units | — | — |
| Completion Year | — | — |
| Transactions | 471 | 669 |
Who Should Buy AMBER PARK vs EMERALD OF KATONG?
🏠 First-Time Buyer
Amber Park presents a more accessible entry point for first-time buyers with a median PSF of $2,473.091, which is $148.54 lower than Emerald of Katong. The lower median PSF allows for a reduced capital outlay for individuals entering the District 15 property market.
📈 Investor
Investors may note that Emerald of Katong has recorded a higher transaction volume of 669 units compared to 471 units at Amber Park. While Emerald of Katong commands a higher median PSF of $2,621.631, Amber Park offers a freehold tenure at a lower median price of $2,473.091 per square foot.
👨👩👧👦 Family
Families prioritizing long-term asset retention in District 15 may prefer Amber Park due to its freehold tenure and median PSF of $2,473.091. Emerald of Katong provides a 99-year leasehold alternative in the same Marine Parade area, where it has seen 669 transactions at a median PSF of $2,621.631.